DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Application for the Correction of
the Coast Guard Record of:
BCMR Docket No. 2007-013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FINAL DECISION
AUTHOR: Ulmer, D.
This proceeding was conducted according to the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and
section 425 of title 14 of the United States Code. The Chair docketed the case on October 23,
2006, upon receipt of the completed application and military records.
appointed members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case.
This final decision, dated June 13, 2007, is approved and signed by the three duly
APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS
The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he was placed
on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL)1 in pay grade E-4, the highest grade he held in the
military, rather than in pay grade E-3, the highest grade he held in the Coast Guard.
The applicant alleged that the highest grade he has held in the military service was pay
grade E-4 and he should have been retired in that grade. He served in the United States Marine
Corps from April 20, 2000, to June 19, 2004. During this service, he was advanced to corporeal
(pay grade E-4), which is the rate he held upon his discharge from the Marine Corps.
After being discharged from the Marine Corps, the applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard
on June 9, 2005, in pay grade E-3.
1 The TDRL is a pending list of individuals whose disabilities are not permanent. In order to be placed on the
TDRL, the individual must have a disability that renders him or her unfit to perform the duties of his or her office,
grade and rank, and the disability must be rated at a minimum of 30% disabling. Temporary Disability retired pay
terminates at the end of 5 years. See Chapter 8 of COMDTINST M1850.2C (Physical Disability Evaluations
Manual).
On April 21, 2006, a Medical Board (MB) convened and diagnosed the applicant as
suffering from chronic post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with delayed onset and with a
personality disorder (NOS (not otherwise specified)).
On May 17, 2006, the Central Physical Evaluation Board (CPEB)2 met and agreed with
the MB that the applicant suffered from PTSD. The CPEB rated the applicant’s disability as
thirty percent disabling and recommended that he be placed on the TDRL.
On May 25, 2006, the applicant accepted the findings of the CPEB and its recommended
disposition and waived his right to a formal hearing. The CPEB findings were reviewed by the
Judge Advocate General (JAG) on June 21, 2006, and approved by the Deputy Commander,
Coast Guard Personnel Command (CGPC) on July 6, 2007.
The applicant was placed on the TDRL with an effective date of August 15, 2006 in pay
grade E-3 with a thirty percent disability rating.
VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On March 14, 2007, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) submitted an advisory opinion
recommending that the Board deny relief. The JAG stated that Article 12.C.15.f. of the
Personnel Manual controls the determination of pay grade upon a member’s placement on the
TDRL. This provision states in relevant part:
Unless entitled to a higher grade under some other provision of law, any Coast
Guard member who retires for physical disability or is placed on the [TDRL]
under 10 U.S.C. 61 is entitled to the grade or rate equal to the highest of:
1. The grade or rate in which the member served on the date his or her
name was placed on the TDRL, or , if his or her name was not carried on that list,
on the date when the member retires.
the Commandant determines.
2. The highest grade or rate in which the member served satisfactorily, as
The JAG stated that Commander, CGPC, acting under the authority of the Commandant,
determined that the highest grade satisfactorily held by the applicant was E-3. The JAG stated
that the Coast Guard Personnel Manual does not include provisions for retiring members at a
higher pay grade attained in prior non-Coast Guard service. The JAG stated that while in the
Coast Guard the applicant never advanced beyond pay grade E-3.
2 The Central Physical Evaluation Board is a permanently established administrative body that evaluates on a
records basis the fitness for duty of active and reserve members and the fitness for duty of members on the
temporary disability retired list. See Chapter 4.A.1. of the Physical Disability Evaluation System Manual
(COMDTINST M1850.2C).
The JAG argued that the Coast Guard acted appropriately and in accordance with
applicable law and regulations in placing the applicant on the TDRL at pay grade E-3. The JAG
further stated that absent evidence to the contrary, government officials are presumed to have
carried out their duties correctly, lawfully, and in good faith. Arens v. United States, 969 F.2d
1034, 1037 (1992). In this regard, the JAG argued that the applicant has failed to meet his
burden of proving error or injustice on the part of the Coast Guard.
APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On March 28, 2007, a copy of the Coast Guard views was mailed to the applicant with 30
days allotted for him to respond. The BCMR did not receive a response from the applicant.
APPLICABLE REGULATION
Article 12.C.15.f. of the Personnel Manual states, in relevant part:
Unless entitled to a higher grade under some other provision of law, any Coast
Guard member who retires for physical disability or is placed on the [TDRL]
under 10 U.S.C. 61 is entitled to the grade or rate equal to the highest of:
1. The grade or rate in which the member served on the date his or her
name was placed on the TDRL, or , if his or her name was not carried on that list,
on the date when the member retires.
2. The highest grade or rate in which the member served satisfactorily, as
the Commandant determines.
Article 12.C.15.g. (Procedure to Certify Highest Grade or Rate on Retirement) of the
Personnel Manual provides the following, in pertinent part:
"1. Commander, (CGPC-epm) or (CGPC-opm) will administratively review the record of each
individual scheduled to retire to determine the highest grade or rate in which his or her Coast
Guard service is satisfactory.”
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the applicant’s
submissions and military records, submission of the Coast Guard, and applicable law:
1. The Board has jurisdiction concerning this matter pursuant to section 1552 of title 10
of the United States Code. The application was timely.
2. Prior to enlisting in the Coast Guard, the applicant served in the Marine Corps for four
years reaching pay grade E-4. His DD Form 214 from the Marine Corps shows that he was
honorably discharged with an RE-1A reenlistment code. Approximately, one year after being
discharged from the Marine Corps, the applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard in pay grade E-3,
the rate he held at the time of his placement on the TDRL.
3. The applicant’s request for retirement in the higher E-4 pay grade is based upon his
Marine Corps service. Article 12.C.15.f. of the Personnel Manual provides, in pertinent part, that
a member being placed on the TDRL is entitled to the rate equal to the highest of:
1. The grade or rate in which the member served on the date his or her name was
placed on the TDRL, or, if his or her name was not carried on that list, on the date
when the member retires.
2. The highest grade or rate in which the member served satisfactorily, as the
Commandant determines.
4. Further, Article 12.C.15.g.1 of the Personnel Manual strongly suggests that non-Coast
Guard service will not be considered in making a highest grade determination. This provision
states, “Commander, (CGPC-epm) or (CGPC-opm) will administratively review the record of
each individual scheduled to retire to determine the highest grade or rate in which his or her
Coast Guard service is satisfactory.” (Emphasis added). Since the applicant never served in
pay grade E-4 while in the Coast Guard, he was properly placed on the TDRL in pay grade E-3,
which is the highest grade he held in the Coast Guard in which his service was satisfactory.
5. Accordingly, the Board finds that the applicant has not demonstrated an error or
injustice in this case and it should be denied.
[ORDER AND SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]
The application of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, USCG (Ret.), for correction of his
ORDER
Kathryn Sinniger
Dorothy J. Ulmer
Thomas H. Van Horn
military record is denied.
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2007-013
This final decision, dated June 13, 2007, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he was placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL)1 in pay grade E-4, the highest grade he held in the military, rather than in pay grade E-3, the highest grade he held in the Coast Guard. This provision states in relevant part: Unless entitled to a higher grade under some other provision...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2005-173
Therefore, he recommended that the CPEB’s findings and recommended disposition be corrected to include this sentence: “The disability in item 10 resulted from an injury or disease that was caused by an armed conflict or an instrumentality of war.” He also noted that the Coast Guard should correct the applicant’s “retired pay reporting transactions affected by this change.” APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On February 15, 2006, the BCMR sent the applicant a copy of the...
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2005-108
This final decision, dated March 8, 2006, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) upon his release from active duty (RELAD) on March 3, 2005, and that he be awarded disability retirement pay from his date of release. of the Medical Manual states the following: Fitness for Duty. In the advisory opinion, the JAG and CGPC recommended...
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2006-092
He stated that he never saw the email in which Coast Guard personnel stated that the TDRL orders should be rescinded. There is no evidence in the record that he served on active duty for more than 30 days while in the Coast Guard; therefore to be entitled to retired pay his diabetic disability must be the proximate result of performing active duty or inactive duty training. § 1204 states in pertinent part that upon a determination by the Secretary concerned that a member of the armed...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2005-091
The applicant was notified that the MB had recommended a finding of unfit for duty and referred his case to the Central Physical Evaluation Board (CPEB) 5. To the contrary, according to the JAG, the record shows that the applicant was properly separated from the Coast Guard after a determination that the applicant had a physical disability that caused him to be unfit for duty. However, the Board finds that he should have discovered it at the time of his discharge from the Coast Guard...
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2003-087
He stated that on May 17, 2002, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) rated his condition as 40% disabling under the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) 2 code 5293 (Intervertebral Disc Syndrome) based on the same medical evidence the Coast Guard used for its 10% disability rating under VASRD code 5295. Article 9.A.14 of COMDTINST M1850.2C (Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) Manual) instructs participants in the PDES to use great care in selecting a...
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2005-124
He stated that both the Coast Guard and the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) use the same criteria in evaluating disabilities, but the DVA rated his PTSD as 30% disabling and his lumbar condition as 20% disabling for a combined disability rating of 50% for the two disabilities. The JAG noted that the DVA findings regarding the applicant’s disabilities have no bearing on the Coast Guard’s decision to separate the applicant upon rating his conditions as 20% disabling. However, the Board...
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2005-078
The medical board noted that the applicant had been offered two years of limited duty for follow-up of his cancer, but now desired a medical board. (2) of the PDES Manual states when the CPEB (or FPEB) reviews the case of a member on the TDRL findings are required for any impairment not previously rated. The evidence further shows that the applicant was placed on the TDRL on March 15, 1999 due to "malignant neoplasm of the genitourinary system" with a 30% disability rating and that no...
CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2003-046
He stated that he returned to the clinic about 15 minutes later, in more pain and complaining that “something was wrong.” At that time, he stated, he informed the nurse that he had a family history of heart disease. The Chief Counsel argued that the applicant submitted an untimely application and has provided the Board with no reason why it is in the interest of justice to excuse the delay. However, the Board finds that the applicant was not a member “who would have been promoted” because...
CG | BCMR | Enlisted Performance | 2006-107
This final decision, dated January 31, 2007, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT'S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military records by removing an April 19, 1982, non-judicial punishment (NJP)1 and the associated performance marks, by awarding him his second good conduct medal, and by advancing him to chief fire control technician (FTC; pay grade E-7). However on April 21, 1982, the applicant's commanding officer (CO) requested that the...